How a Medical Lawyer Evaluates a Medical Malpractice Case

January 5, 2010

Becoming a victim of medical malpractice can be one of the most upsetting and confusing experiences of one’s life.  Dealing with medical treatments, physical and emotional pain, and adjusting to life after the incident are enough to set your mind reeling.  The next step of meeting with a medical attorney can be just as confusing, so it can be helpful to know ahead of time what to expect and how your lawyer will likely handle your case.

Although many states have different laws governing medical malpractice cases, for the most part the initial process is pretty common across the board.  The first steps typically involve the following:

Initial meeting and fact finding session. The very first step in filing a medical malpractice lawsuit is determining whether or not malpractice actually occurred, and if it’s possible to be proven in court.  An experienced medical attorney will sit down and discuss your situation in detail to evaluate whether you have an actionable claim.  This is also a good time to ask any questions or bring up any concerns you may have.

Obtaining appropriate records.  Once it’s determined that you are likely a victim of medical malpractice, your attorney will want to get right to work gathering important records like medical files, charts and any other documentation that will help build your case.

Getting an expert’s opinion.  Although an experienced medical attorney could be considered an expert in the field of medical malpractice law, he or she is most likely not an expert in interpreting medical records.  This is why most malpractice attorneys have medical experts upon which they call to review a client’s detailed medical documentation.  This is typically when a final decision is made as to whether malpractice actually occurred.  This same expert may also testify on your behalf if your case goes to trial.

Estimation of the damages. Your attorney will then review all the facts in the case, including the evaluation performed by the medical expert, and determine just how much of a value can be placed on the damages you’ve suffered.  He or she will consider things such as past and future medical expenses, lost wages, loss of consortium, and pain and suffering, to come to an amount that makes sense to sue for.  This part is also important for the attorney since most medical lawyers are paid on a contingency basis, meaning they receive a portion of the final settlement amount.  The attorney has to be sure that you will receive a reasonable recovery amount while at the same time he or she will be properly compensated for their hard work on the case.

The truth is, at any point during these initial steps it may be determined that the case isn’t worth pursuing for one reason or another, be it lack of enough evidence or the unlikelihood that it will net enough to satisfy both the client and the attorney.

Another thing to take note of is that the more prepared you are as a client, before consulting with a medical attorney, the better your chances of having a legitimate claim.  It’s a good idea to begin documenting everything pertaining to your injury as soon as you suspect malpractice.  The more information you have, the easier it will be for your medical lawyer to work with you and hopefully get you the compensation you deserve, and knowing what to expect before you meet with a lawyer can make the whole experience much less stressful.


New Breast Cancer Test May Reduce Medical Malpractice Claims

December 28, 2009

A study recently released by The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reveals that newer minimally invasive breast cancer tests are just as accurate as surgical biopsies.  This is great news because it means that there are more options for women who don’t want to take the risk of surgery, and it also means that medical malpractice cases relating to breast biopsies may decline.

The study compared more commonly used surgical biopsies to what’s known as “core needle biopsies”, which are much less invasive.  It revealed that although open surgery was previously considered the most accurate method of testing for the disease, recent technological improvements have made the core needle method just as reliable.  And, not surprisingly, women tend to prefer the core needle test to open surgery because it is less invasive and carries fewer risks.

Open surgical biopsies involve removing the questionable breast tissue by way of a surgical incision.  The reason the risks are so much greater with this type of procedure is because the patient is typically under general anesthesia during the biopsy and is sometimes required to stay overnight in the hospital to recover.  And, of course, there is risk of medical malpractice associated with any type of surgical procedure, no matter how small.

The core needle biopsy involves insertion of a hollow core needle through the skin and into the breast tissue to collect a sample.  The core test is usually done as an out-patient procedure, and typically only requires the use of local anesthesia.
Another important fact to note is that only a small percentage of women who undergo breast biopsies are actually suffering from cancer.  This means that the core needle biopsy will help reduce the number of woman who are not suffering from cancer, but are still placed at risk of a surgical procedure, thereby reducing the chance of surgical malpractice on countless patients.

Of course, each situation is different, and all options should be carefully researched and considered on a case by case basis.  It’s always best to discuss with a doctor to determine which method would be best.  However, hopefully this new option will encourage women to be advocates for their own health and help reduce the risk they face in the process.

For some people, this message comes too late.  Anyone who has been harmed during a surgical breast biopsy should contact a medical attorney immediately to find out if there is a legitimate case of medical malpractice.


Woman Sues Hospital for Amputating Legs

December 24, 2009

A young Pennsylvania woman is suing Uniontown Hospital for medical malpractice claiming that doctors overlooked an acute medical condition due to her intoxication.  As a result, the 20 year old underwent partial amputation of both of her legs.

According to the medical lawsuit, Shanna Hiles had consumed a large amount of alcohol while celebrating her birthday and subsequently lost consciousness.  She remained unconscious, seated on the floor with her legs tucked under her for over 12 hours before she was discovered by a relative the following day.

As a result of the position she had been in, she was experiencing tremendous pain in her legs, and was taken to the hospital.  It is there that Hiles’ medical attorney claims that doctors were negligent in failing to promptly and accurately diagnose the condition she was suffering from, known as acute compartment syndrome.  The condition is reversible with timely surgical intervention.

Hiles was not treated promptly, however, and was instead left unattended for nearly six hours because she was intoxicated.  She was finally air lifted to another hospital where it was necessary that both legs be partially amputated.

Hiles medical lawyer claims that his client would never have had to undergo such drastic surgery had she been properly monitored and treated.  She is seeking an undisclosed amount in damages.


North Carolina Expands Database to Include Medical Malpractice

December 22, 2009

Residents of North Carolina are one step closer to being able to proactively avoid becoming victims of medical malpractice thanks to the state Medical Board expanding their online database to include record of such incidents.

The website, ncmedboard.org, now includes information on medical malpractice lawsuits, suspensions, convictions and other disciplinary actions against the 35,000 doctors and other medical professionals that are licensed in North Carolina, all of which now must be reported to the board by law.

Patients can search the database by doctor’s name or by city.  This is a huge step in the right direction for transparency and allowing patients to take back control of their own health care.  It is likely that there will be fewer cases of medical malpractice in NC now that this resource is available for residents.


The Dangers of Radiation Malpractice

December 20, 2009

In recent months there have been quite a few reported cases of radiation malpractice, enough to raise concern that it is becoming a little too common.  The most recent case, involving an Alabama woman, even has the FDA launching an investigation.

Becky Coudert went to Huntsville Hospital in September where she was diagnosed as suffering from Bell’s Palsy, which causes paralysis of the face.  In an attempt to confirm the diagnosis, Coudert was given a CT scan, a test that involves the use of radiation.

A few weeks later, she began having difficulty speaking and had blurred vision, and her hair began falling out.  When she went back to the hospital she was informed that she may have been given an overdose of radiation.  Not just a little overdose, either.  Coudert received 12 to 14 times what she should have.

It is unclear whether the overdose was caused by human error or malfunction of the machinery, but regardless, Coudert has filed a medical malpractice lawsuit and the incident has caught the attention of the Food and Drug Administration, who is also investigating the hospital.

Perhaps the most disturbing part of the case is that the hospital in question may have actually administered too much radiation to some 60 patients.  These patients are being contacted as part of the investigation.

Radiation overdose can be quite serious and some of the side effects include:

  • Hair loss
  • Nausea
  • Headache
  • Infections
  • Fever
  • Vomiting
  • Fatigue
  • Weakness
  • Erythema (redness of the skin)

Anyone who may have experienced radiation malpractice should contact a medical attorney immediately.


British Doctors Warned about Online Flirting and Medical Malpractice

December 11, 2009

An interesting warning has been issued to doctors in England by a medical organization that advises physicians on how to avoid medical malpractice lawsuits, but perhaps it is just a sign of the times.  They are reminding doctors of the dangers of online flirting with patients on social networking websites.

The Medical Defense Union is addressing the increasing popularity of social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace and urging doctors who choose to be “friends” with patients on such networks to be careful about their conduct.

The organization’s warning reminds physicians that flirting with patients can raise ethical questions because of their role of trust in society.  It points out that these online connections sometimes blur the boundaries between doctor and patient, and could end up resulting in a medical malpractice lawsuit when these lines are crossed.

Likewise, remember that as a patient, anything you share on the internet, regardless of the site’s so-called privacy settings, can end up being used against you.  Medical malpractice cases are a good example of this, since many a defense attorney has been able to shed a negative light on a plaintiff by accessing something they posted online and thought was protected.  Always keep this in mind, particularly if you are involved in any type of legal action.


Settlement Reached in James Woods’ Medical Malpractice Suit

December 9, 2009

Actor James Woods has settled his wrongful death lawsuit against the RI hospital where his brother died of a heart attack in 2006 as a result of alleged medical malpractice.

The lawsuit claimed that Woods’ brother Michael was neglected when he went to Kent County Hospital complaining of a sore throat and frequent vomiting.  He died of a heart attack while on a gurney in the hall of the hospital.

The settlement announced a few days ago includes an undisclosed monetary amount for the Woods family and an apology from an executive representing the hospital.

Additionally, and perhaps the most victorious part of the settlement, was the hospital’s promise to create an institute named after the victim.  The Michael J. Woods Institute will focus primarily on researching medical errors and developing ways to reduce these errors and have a positive impact on the medical community.

Again, it’s important to remember that medical malpractice does not discriminate.  It can happen to the rich and famous, it can happen to their family members, and it can happen to you.  If you have suffered injury due to medical negligence, you are urged to contact a medical lawyer as soon as possible.


New Website Aimed at Reducing Hospital Infections

December 3, 2009

When a person develops an infection while being treated at a hospital or other health care facility, it is known as a health-care associated infection, or hospital-acquired infection (HAI for short).  It is a global epidemic with as many as 1.4 million people throughout the world suffering its ill effects.  And given the dangerous nature of such infections, sometimes even causing death, these HAI’s often result in medical malpractice lawsuits.

Those who do survive HAI’s often face permanent injury, further hospitalizations and treatments, resulting in even more cost to the patient, not to mention pain and suffering and other losses.

Part of the problem has been the lack of reporting required by hospitals and healthcare facilities, which has contributed to underestimation of the problem and a subsequent lack of emphasis placed on addressing the issue and reducing the number of incidents occurring.

Kimberly-Clarke Corporation, however, is taking steps to begin making a difference by partnering with doctors and hospitals nationwide to educate medical staff and management on HAI prevention.  The HAI Education Program is part of a national campaign of awareness called “Not on My Watch”.  Part of the program involves providing toolkits to healthcare facilities that contain posters, patient safety tips and informational flyers.

The innovative campaign also employs what’s called the HAI Education Bus, a one-of-a-kind classroom on wheels that travels around the country bringing continuing education, and equipping medical professionals with guidelines and best practices to reduce the incidences of hospital-acquired infections.

Given the danger associated with hospital infections, only positive results can come of this type of training, and as a result we can hope to see fewer reported incidents of HAI’s in the future, as well as fewer medical malpractice lawsuits involving these deadly infections.

If it’s too late for you, however, and you were injured as a result of an HAI, contact a medical lawyer today to find out your rights.


Doctor with History of Medical Malpractice Claims Still Practicing

November 25, 2009

A doctor who recently had his license revoked by the Florida Medical Board has moved and is now practicing medicine in New York, despite the allegations of medical malpractice against him.

You may have read about the young girl who went to see Dr. Pierre Jean-Jacques Renelique for an abortion at his Florida clinic several months ago.  The doctor was late to arrive and the girl ended up delivering her baby while she waited.  The medical malpractice comes into play when a staff member of the medical facility allegedly placed the fetus in the trash and Dr. Renelique later falsified the medical records to cover up the incident.

Given the details of the case, the state Medical Board took action and implemented the harshest punishment allowed, which was to revoke the doctor’s license to practice medicine.  The problem is, his license was only revoked in Florida, which means that he is still able to treat patients in any other state in which he is licensed.

It appears that is exactly what Dr. Renelique has done.  He has moved to New York and is now working at a clinic in the Bronx.  The question remains, do his current patients know about his dark past, and would they choose not to be treated by him if they were aware.

This is yet another example of the importance of doing your homework before you seek treatment from a physician.  Just because they are free to practice in your state, doesn’t mean that they haven’t had prior issues in other states.  A great resource for this is the Federation of State Medical Boards website , where you can look up disciplinary actions and other sanctions against a doctor.

Remember, the best way to avoid a medical malpractice claim is to take measures to avoid becoming a victim before it happens.


What is Informed Consent?

November 21, 2009

In terms of medical treatment, it’s a fair statement to say that every patient has the right to be properly informed about any type of care they are to receive, so that they are able to make appropriate, well thought out decisions as to their own healthcare.  This is basically known as informed consent, and when it is absent the result may be medical malpractice.

Informed consent means that any doctor or medical professional who is going to perform a procedure or treatment on you has to first give you all the relevant information regarding such treatment, allowing you ample time to decide whether or not you agree to it.  Although it can be verbal, consent is typically given in writing, and will usually contain the following information:

  • Who the doctor is that is going to be treating you
  • The physician’s qualifications
  • The medical condition you currently suffer from
  • The reason why the treatment or procedure is being recommended
  • Any and all risks involved
  • The alternatives available to the patient, their risks and whether non-treatment is also an option
  • How successful the treatment or procedure is expected to be
  • Estimated time of recovery
  • Costs associated with the procedure, and if it is likely to be covered by health insurance

Of course, there are certain circumstances, such as an emergency situation or when a patient is unconscious, when informed consent is not possible.  In these situations, physicians are expected to act in the best interest of the patient and within the appropriate standard of care.  They cannot, however, decide to perform additional procedures that aren’t medically necessary, or assume that a patient would have elected to do so had they been conscious at the time or given the ability to make an informed decision.

Lack of informed consent is not always cut and dry and can be difficult to prove.  In order to be successful in a medical malpractice case of this nature, you must be able to prove that an injury you suffered was as a direct result of not receiving appropriate informed consent, and that had you been properly informed you wouldn’t have consented.

The best chance for a successful outcome in an informed consent malpractice case is to first discuss the details of your situation with an experienced medical attorney.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.