Think Tort Reform will Reduce Health Care Costs? Think Again.

February 17, 2010

From the Sacramento Bee.

There might be good reasons to consider changes in how malpractice suits are handled. But the idea that tort reform would significantly slow, or even alter, the trajectory of U.S. health care spending is not among them.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office recently estimated that tort reform could save $41 billion over the next decade, a figure now being touted by proponents.

To most of us, $41 billion is a lot of money. In the world of health care, it’s a tiny drop in a very large ocean. Between now and 2019, annual health care spending will increase by $2 trillion. Not to $2 trillion. It will grow by $2 trillion, from $2.5 trillion to about $4.5 trillion.

The projected savings from capping malpractice awards works out to a 2 percent reduction in what we otherwise would spend.

A Measly 2 percent!

Read the whole article/editorial here…  http://www.sacbee.com/846/story/2542910.html

1 Comment | Medical Malpractice, Tort Reform | Tagged: , | Permalink
Posted by Dave Austin

Surgeon Sued for Negligence

February 6, 2010

Suzette Carlin, who has been battling for over a decade after suffering surgical malpractice, has finally won her case.  A jury awarded her $2.4 million to compensate her for the botched bowel surgery she underwent in October 1998, which has left her scarred and in constant pain.

At the time of the incident, Mrs. Carlin was already in the hospital where she was receiving ongoing “conservative medical management” for what doctors had diagnosed as an obstructed bowel.  Her gastroenterologist had determined that her condition was improving, and decided to keep her on the course of treatment she was on.

That all changed, however, when her gastroenterologist left town for a few days and she was seen by Dr. Zahid Chohan, a surgeon, who immediately scheduled Carlin for surgery the following day during which he removed more than twelve inches of her intestine.

Over the next several months Carlin was forced to undergo additional surgeries and was treated for multiple infections and complications caused by the original procedure.  Her medical attorney stated that Carlin spent a total of 88 days in the hospital, and must take medication daily to combat the pain she experiences.  She also has difficulty controlling her bowels and is terribly scarred.

The medical malpractice trial lasted three weeks before the jury found in favor of the plaintiff and her husband, awarding them $2.2 million and $200,000, respectively.

1 Comment | Medical Malpractice | Tagged: , , , | Permalink
Posted by Dave Austin

Medical Negligence Abroad

January 31, 2010

A New Delhi family is alleging that the doctors who delivered their baby gravely injured her and caused her death, just two days after her birth.  The level of medical negligence is shocking, as it was revealed that the newborn’s arm was slashed with a scalpel during her mother’s caesarian section.

Perhaps even more alarming is the fact that the initial injury may not be what caused her death.  According to the baby’s father, his daughter lay for two days and doctors never even dressed the gaping wound on her arm.

The hospital is all but denying the allegations, stating simply that, “the baby’s arm got hurt but it was not serious”.  They went on to say that “things like this do happen”.

Given the level of shock and anger over the child’s senseless death, the hospital is now being investigated by authorities and a promise has been made that the appropriate action will be taken against those who are found guilty.

It’s certainly no surprise that cases of medical malpractice occur all over the globe.  In fact, its cases like this that serve as reminders of how much more dangerous medical care can be in other countries.  But although the standard of care is typically higher in the US than in other nations, medical errors still occur.  If you have been a victim, contact a medical attorney right away to discuss your rights.

Leave a Comment » | Medical Malpractice | Tagged: , , | Permalink
Posted by Dave Austin

Visiting an Independent Medical Examiner: What to Expect

January 29, 2010

Filing a medical malpractice lawsuit can be complicated and there are many different steps that must be taken before the case is either settled or goes to court.  One of these steps is typically having to be evaluated by an independent medical examiner, which is a doctor hired by the defendant’s insurance company.

It’s important to keep in mind that an independent medical examiner’s main objective is to assist the defense in disproving your claim or minimizing the extent of your injuries.  Given this fact, you should be prepared ahead of time and know what to expect before your appointment so that you don’t do anything that might hurt your case.

Here are a few suggestions:

Be concise when answering questions. When asked about your pain or symptoms, state them clearly and concisely.  Rambling on may result in your saying the wrong thing by mistake, or mentioning something that may hurt your case in the long run.  Keep it to the point and you will be fine.

Be polite and cooperative. There is no need to be hostile with the independent medical examiner, even though you know he is technically not on your side.  Be as pleasant as you can and do as he or she asks.  For example, if the doctor requests that you bend or twist, do so to the best of your ability, but don’t make a production of it.

Know your condition and don’t minimize it. Although it’s good to be concise in your answers, you should also be sure not to leave out anything important when it involves your pain and symptoms.  Be specific in your list of limitations and complaints so that everything important is properly documented.

Avoid exaggeration. It may be tempting to get carried away when describing the real pain you’re experiencing, but try to keep it realistic.  Going overboard may make you appear to be dishonest which can only hurt your case.

Understand the details of your claim. The medical examiner may ask you specific questions about your case, like the date of the incident, the details of what happened, or the names of doctors you have consulted with.  Know this stuff ahead of time so that you’re prepared and confident.

Try not to be emotional. Certainly the experience of being a medical malpractice victim can be an emotional one, and dealing with the pain and suffering is upsetting.  But try to stay as focused as possible when meeting with the medical examiner.  Leaving the emotion out of it can make the visit go much more quickly and smoothly.

Be honest. Medical malpractice is a very real problem in this country, and only those cases that are legitimate should be pursued.  If a medical attorney has agreed that you are, in fact, a victim, there should be no reason to lie or stretch the truth when visiting with an independent medical examiner.  Doing so will only serve to hurt your case so remember to keep it honest.

These are just a few suggestions to help prepare you for this part of your case.  Your medical attorney will sit down with you to discuss your concerns and answer any questions you may have before you go to the appointment.  Being prepared and knowing what to expect can make a difference between a winning case or a loss.

Leave a Comment » | Medical Malpractice | Tagged: , , , | Permalink
Posted by Dave Austin

Hundreds of Patients Affected in MD Hospital Malpractice Case

January 27, 2010

A hospital in Maryland is currently notifying patients of the possibility of mass medical malpractice after it was discovered that as many as 369 patients may have received unnecessary arterial stent implants.

Cardiac catheterization with the use of coronary stents is commonly done in an attempt to open up clogged arteries.  According to reports, the patients affected had only minor blockages in their arteries that did not warrant the use of coronary stents.  As a result these patients were exposed to unnecessary risk.

Coronary stents are typically implanted via the bloodstream and through the leg.  The risks associated with cardiac catheterization include:

  • Bleeding
  • Infection
  • Allergic reaction
  • Damage to blood vessels
  • Blood clots
  • Low blood pressure
  • Kidney damage
  • Arrhythmias
  • Heart Attack
  • Stroke

It is believed that a possible underlying reason for the unnecessary procedures is health care fraud, for which the hospital is currently under investigation.  These procedures are quite costly and most insurance providers, including Medicare, require that a patient’s artery be at least 70% blocked before they will approve the use of a stent.  It is reported that the hospital told the affected patients that they had frighteningly large blockages, some up to 95%, when in reality most of the blockages were less than 10%.

Being forced to undergo any unnecessary procedure can be physically and emotionally taxing on anyone.  The fact that the patients involved in this case underwent such a dangerous one only makes the situation that much more upsetting.  We will most likely see an influx of medical malpractice lawsuits as a result.

Leave a Comment » | Medical Malpractice | Tagged: , , | Permalink
Posted by Dave Austin

German Doctor Convicted of Egregious Medical Malpractice

January 21, 2010

Medical malpractice doesn’t happen only in the United States.  On the contrary, cases of doctors’ negligence occur even more frequently in countries abroad, due in part to less stringent safety regulations, poor conditions and more lax medical practices.  A recent case in Germany, however, has nothing to do with unsanitary conditions.  It’s a shocking case of blatant medical malpractice – for which the doctor responsible has been charged criminally.

Arnold Pier, director of a small private hospital in Wegberg, is being charged with causing bodily harm resulting in death for using lemon juice instead of sterile solutions to clean and disinfect his patients’ surgical wounds.  There are 64 counts against him involving 18 patients.

On Friday Pier was found guilty on one of those counts and sentenced to 15 months for the death of an unnamed woman who died as a result of a severe infection from the use of lemon juice in her wound.  The court found that the woman was not given informed consent about the unconventional treatment and therefore did not know the risks involved.

Court documents revealed that Pier regularly instructed hospital staff to use lemon juice, which was not properly sterilized, in the treatment of wounds as a way to cut costs for the struggling medical facility.  Prosecutors also allege that Pier conducted several unnecessary surgeries including kidney and gall bladder removals, as a way to make more money.

The judge presiding over the case called the acts committed a clear case of medical malpractice.  There are several additional cases pending against Pier regarding other patients who lost their lives due to his negligence.

Leave a Comment » | Medical Malpractice | Tagged: , | Permalink
Posted by Dave Austin

Medical Malpractice Suit Filed for Unauthorized Sterilization

January 16, 2010

A Massachusetts woman is suing Baystate Medical Center for medical malpractice claiming they sterilized her without her consent.  The 35 year old mother of nine says doctors violated her reproductive rights.

Tessa Savicki went into the hospital in December 2006 to give birth to her ninth child.  She had previously asked doctors to implant an intrauterine birth control device (IUD) following the birth, but instead doctors performed a tubal ligation, permanently preventing her from having any more children.

Savicki’s nine children do not all have the same father, she is unemployed and she receives state aid to support her and her children.  She also suffers from non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.  But she says, taking all of this information into consideration, regardless of how anyone else may feel about her reproductive activity, doctors violated her rights and committed medical malpractice when they performed the unauthorized procedure.

The key that may make all the difference in her lawsuit lies in the fact that Savicki never signed a written consent, which happens to be required under state and federal regulations.  Not only must one sign said consent, but it must be signed at least 30 days prior to the procedure being performed.  With no proof of consent, doctors in this case may be looking at a difficult road in defending their actions in this case.

It has not yet been specified how much Savicki’s medical lawyer is seeking on her behalf.

1 Comment | Medical Malpractice | Tagged: , , , | Permalink
Posted by Dave Austin

Rite Aid Sued for Prescription Malpractice

January 14, 2010

The family of a MI man is suing Rite Aid for the wrongful death of John Sheridan, alleging prescription malpractice contributed to his premature death.

Sheridan, who had malignant melanoma that had spread to his brain, was prescribed a lethal dose of a chemotherapy drug Temodar.  The prescription instructed him to take 14 capsules daily, approximately ten times the normal dose and nearly double that which would be considered fatal.  Sheridan did as instructed and took the medication, which actually caused his cancer to grow rapidly.

The prescription malpractice lawsuit claims that the overdose was a contributing factor to Sheridan’s early death at age 52.  His wife hopes the legal action she is taking will result in changes in pharmacy policy so this never happens to anyone else.

The doctor who wrote the incorrect prescription admitted fault and has settled with the family.  Katherine Sheridan is pursuing the pharmacy now, because she feels the error should have been caught before the prescription was ever filled and distributed to her husband.

Prescription malpractice is one of the most dangerous forms of negligence.  Patients who take the wrong drug, or too much of a medication can suffer further illness or even death, as in this case.  If you have been the victim of this type of medical malpractice, you should contact a medical attorney immediately to find out what your rights are.

Leave a Comment » | Medical Malpractice | Tagged: , , , | Permalink
Posted by Dave Austin

Canadian Woman Suing for Chiropractic Malpractice

January 9, 2010

Debbie Henderson, a 43 year old Canadian woman, has filed a lawsuit for chiropractic malpractice claiming she suffered a stroke shortly after receiving treatment.

Henderson went to see her chiropractor last May complaining of frequent, recurring headaches.  According to the lawsuit, the doctor had her lying on her back on his table when he stated, “Oh, this is what is causing your headaches” and proceeded to perform what’s known as a cervical neck manipulation.

The suit claims that when the chiropractor violently turned Henderson’s head to the left and then immediately to the right she heard two loud cracks.  She left the office and walked a short distance to the building where her mother lives.  Shortly after arriving Henderson began to feel disoriented and was taken by ambulance to the hospital.

It was then that doctors determined Henderson had suffered a stroke.  The cause was damage to her internal carotid artery, a result of her chiropractic treatment.  Henderson remained in the hospital for 17 days, and now she claims to suffer from lingering side effects such as brain damage, loss of sight in her right eye, weakness and slurred speech, among other conditions.

The details of the chiropractic malpractice lawsuit do not include how much Henderson is seeking in damages.

Source:  Cnews.canoe.ca

Leave a Comment » | Medical Malpractice | Tagged: , , | Permalink
Posted by Dave Austin

Doctor Wins Lawsuit for Daughter’s Birth Injury

January 7, 2010

Dr. Angelique Campden learned first hand that medical malpractice can happen to anyone – even someone who works in the medical industry.  She recently filed a lawsuit against Cedars-Sinai Medical Center claiming they caused her daughter’s birth injury due to substandard care.

Campden’s daughter Paris was born prematurely and spent several weeks in the neo-natal unit as a result.  At one point, Campden claims that she noticed her baby was exhibiting signs of distress and brought her concerns to the staff.  Paris’s heart rate was alarmingly slow and she ceased breathing on multiple occasions.  She was also overly lethargic.

According to Dr. Campden and her medical attorney, despite her concerns hospital staff did not take action, attributing the infant’s symptoms to an anesthetic that had been used a few days earlier during removal of a catheter.

Dr. Campden was right to be alarmed, however, because her daughter was actually suffering from a dangerous hospital infection known as serratia bacterial infection.  It is known to be aggressive in newborns, but its effects can be minimized with prompt treatment.  Unfortunately, in Paris’s case, antibiotics were not administered until some 11 hours later, and by then she had suffered irreparable brain damage.

A jury confirmed Dr. Campden’s assertion that the hospital had committed medical malpractice and ordered them to pay over $7 million in damages.  The money will likely be used to pay for the special needs care that Paris now requires.

Leave a Comment » | Medical Malpractice | Tagged: , , | Permalink
Posted by Dave Austin

« Previous Entries
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.