Medical Malpractice Suit Filed for Unauthorized Sterilization

January 16, 2010

A Massachusetts woman is suing Baystate Medical Center for medical malpractice claiming they sterilized her without her consent.  The 35 year old mother of nine says doctors violated her reproductive rights.

Tessa Savicki went into the hospital in December 2006 to give birth to her ninth child.  She had previously asked doctors to implant an intrauterine birth control device (IUD) following the birth, but instead doctors performed a tubal ligation, permanently preventing her from having any more children.

Savicki’s nine children do not all have the same father, she is unemployed and she receives state aid to support her and her children.  She also suffers from non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.  But she says, taking all of this information into consideration, regardless of how anyone else may feel about her reproductive activity, doctors violated her rights and committed medical malpractice when they performed the unauthorized procedure.

The key that may make all the difference in her lawsuit lies in the fact that Savicki never signed a written consent, which happens to be required under state and federal regulations.  Not only must one sign said consent, but it must be signed at least 30 days prior to the procedure being performed.  With no proof of consent, doctors in this case may be looking at a difficult road in defending their actions in this case.

It has not yet been specified how much Savicki’s medical lawyer is seeking on her behalf.


Rite Aid Sued for Prescription Malpractice

January 14, 2010

The family of a MI man is suing Rite Aid for the wrongful death of John Sheridan, alleging prescription malpractice contributed to his premature death.

Sheridan, who had malignant melanoma that had spread to his brain, was prescribed a lethal dose of a chemotherapy drug Temodar.  The prescription instructed him to take 14 capsules daily, approximately ten times the normal dose and nearly double that which would be considered fatal.  Sheridan did as instructed and took the medication, which actually caused his cancer to grow rapidly.

The prescription malpractice lawsuit claims that the overdose was a contributing factor to Sheridan’s early death at age 52.  His wife hopes the legal action she is taking will result in changes in pharmacy policy so this never happens to anyone else.

The doctor who wrote the incorrect prescription admitted fault and has settled with the family.  Katherine Sheridan is pursuing the pharmacy now, because she feels the error should have been caught before the prescription was ever filled and distributed to her husband.

Prescription malpractice is one of the most dangerous forms of negligence.  Patients who take the wrong drug, or too much of a medication can suffer further illness or even death, as in this case.  If you have been the victim of this type of medical malpractice, you should contact a medical attorney immediately to find out what your rights are.


4.6 Million Medical Malpractice Verdict

January 12, 2010

A jury has deliberated in the medical malpractice case brought by Buddy Hackney against his urologist and awarded the plaintiff and his wife a settlement totaling over $4.6 million.

Hackney claimed that his wound was bandaged for six days following a surgical procedure he underwent, during which time Dr. Mark Swofford failed to check the dressing.  Had he properly monitored the wound, he would have found that the dressing was impeding the patient’s blood supply, but because this went unchecked Hackney developed gangrene.

Several subsequent surgeries have still left Hackney permanently disabled.

After deliberating for just three hours, the jury found in favor of the Hackneys awarding Buddy $3,867,612.99 and $750,000 to his wife Geneva.

Surgical errors should never be taken lightly.  If you have been harmed at the hands of a negligent doctor you have the right to seek compensation.  Your best course of action is to discuss your situation with an experienced medical attorney.


Canadian Woman Suing for Chiropractic Malpractice

January 9, 2010

Debbie Henderson, a 43 year old Canadian woman, has filed a lawsuit for chiropractic malpractice claiming she suffered a stroke shortly after receiving treatment.

Henderson went to see her chiropractor last May complaining of frequent, recurring headaches.  According to the lawsuit, the doctor had her lying on her back on his table when he stated, “Oh, this is what is causing your headaches” and proceeded to perform what’s known as a cervical neck manipulation.

The suit claims that when the chiropractor violently turned Henderson’s head to the left and then immediately to the right she heard two loud cracks.  She left the office and walked a short distance to the building where her mother lives.  Shortly after arriving Henderson began to feel disoriented and was taken by ambulance to the hospital.

It was then that doctors determined Henderson had suffered a stroke.  The cause was damage to her internal carotid artery, a result of her chiropractic treatment.  Henderson remained in the hospital for 17 days, and now she claims to suffer from lingering side effects such as brain damage, loss of sight in her right eye, weakness and slurred speech, among other conditions.

The details of the chiropractic malpractice lawsuit do not include how much Henderson is seeking in damages.

Source:  Cnews.canoe.ca


Doctor Wins Lawsuit for Daughter’s Birth Injury

January 7, 2010

Dr. Angelique Campden learned first hand that medical malpractice can happen to anyone – even someone who works in the medical industry.  She recently filed a lawsuit against Cedars-Sinai Medical Center claiming they caused her daughter’s birth injury due to substandard care.

Campden’s daughter Paris was born prematurely and spent several weeks in the neo-natal unit as a result.  At one point, Campden claims that she noticed her baby was exhibiting signs of distress and brought her concerns to the staff.  Paris’s heart rate was alarmingly slow and she ceased breathing on multiple occasions.  She was also overly lethargic.

According to Dr. Campden and her medical attorney, despite her concerns hospital staff did not take action, attributing the infant’s symptoms to an anesthetic that had been used a few days earlier during removal of a catheter.

Dr. Campden was right to be alarmed, however, because her daughter was actually suffering from a dangerous hospital infection known as serratia bacterial infection.  It is known to be aggressive in newborns, but its effects can be minimized with prompt treatment.  Unfortunately, in Paris’s case, antibiotics were not administered until some 11 hours later, and by then she had suffered irreparable brain damage.

A jury confirmed Dr. Campden’s assertion that the hospital had committed medical malpractice and ordered them to pay over $7 million in damages.  The money will likely be used to pay for the special needs care that Paris now requires.


How a Medical Lawyer Evaluates a Medical Malpractice Case

January 5, 2010

Becoming a victim of medical malpractice can be one of the most upsetting and confusing experiences of one’s life.  Dealing with medical treatments, physical and emotional pain, and adjusting to life after the incident are enough to set your mind reeling.  The next step of meeting with a medical attorney can be just as confusing, so it can be helpful to know ahead of time what to expect and how your lawyer will likely handle your case.

Although many states have different laws governing medical malpractice cases, for the most part the initial process is pretty common across the board.  The first steps typically involve the following:

Initial meeting and fact finding session. The very first step in filing a medical malpractice lawsuit is determining whether or not malpractice actually occurred, and if it’s possible to be proven in court.  An experienced medical attorney will sit down and discuss your situation in detail to evaluate whether you have an actionable claim.  This is also a good time to ask any questions or bring up any concerns you may have.

Obtaining appropriate records.  Once it’s determined that you are likely a victim of medical malpractice, your attorney will want to get right to work gathering important records like medical files, charts and any other documentation that will help build your case.

Getting an expert’s opinion.  Although an experienced medical attorney could be considered an expert in the field of medical malpractice law, he or she is most likely not an expert in interpreting medical records.  This is why most malpractice attorneys have medical experts upon which they call to review a client’s detailed medical documentation.  This is typically when a final decision is made as to whether malpractice actually occurred.  This same expert may also testify on your behalf if your case goes to trial.

Estimation of the damages. Your attorney will then review all the facts in the case, including the evaluation performed by the medical expert, and determine just how much of a value can be placed on the damages you’ve suffered.  He or she will consider things such as past and future medical expenses, lost wages, loss of consortium, and pain and suffering, to come to an amount that makes sense to sue for.  This part is also important for the attorney since most medical lawyers are paid on a contingency basis, meaning they receive a portion of the final settlement amount.  The attorney has to be sure that you will receive a reasonable recovery amount while at the same time he or she will be properly compensated for their hard work on the case.

The truth is, at any point during these initial steps it may be determined that the case isn’t worth pursuing for one reason or another, be it lack of enough evidence or the unlikelihood that it will net enough to satisfy both the client and the attorney.

Another thing to take note of is that the more prepared you are as a client, before consulting with a medical attorney, the better your chances of having a legitimate claim.  It’s a good idea to begin documenting everything pertaining to your injury as soon as you suspect malpractice.  The more information you have, the easier it will be for your medical lawyer to work with you and hopefully get you the compensation you deserve, and knowing what to expect before you meet with a lawyer can make the whole experience much less stressful.


Nursing Home Neglect Blamed in Wrongful Death Lawsuit

January 3, 2010

The executor of the estate of Jack Cornett, who died in 2008 while in the care of Richmond Health and Rehabilitation Complex, has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the nursing home and three of its administrators, claiming that their neglect led to Mr. Cornett’s death.

Cornett was a resident of the nursing home for less than a year, during which time he suffered from multiple injuries and complications including:

  • Dehydration
  • Weight loss
  • Poor hygiene
  • Pressure sores
  • Unexplained bruising
  • Compromised nutrition
  • Multiple falls
  • Infections
  • Physical and mental pain and suffering

The lawsuit claims that the nursing facility wasn’t properly staffed which led to failure to deliver appropriate care to its residents.  As a result, Mr. Cornett did not receive the proper sanitary care, medications, wound care and several other claims which the lawsuit alleges accelerated his death.

Mr. Cornett’s estate is requesting compensation to cover the cost of medical and funeral expenses, pain and suffering of the family, loss of spousal consortium, loss of life and mental anguish.

If you suspect that nursing home neglect caused the death of your loved one, you should contact an experienced medical attorney immediately so that justice can be pursued on their behalf.


New Breast Cancer Test May Reduce Medical Malpractice Claims

December 28, 2009

A study recently released by The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reveals that newer minimally invasive breast cancer tests are just as accurate as surgical biopsies.  This is great news because it means that there are more options for women who don’t want to take the risk of surgery, and it also means that medical malpractice cases relating to breast biopsies may decline.

The study compared more commonly used surgical biopsies to what’s known as “core needle biopsies”, which are much less invasive.  It revealed that although open surgery was previously considered the most accurate method of testing for the disease, recent technological improvements have made the core needle method just as reliable.  And, not surprisingly, women tend to prefer the core needle test to open surgery because it is less invasive and carries fewer risks.

Open surgical biopsies involve removing the questionable breast tissue by way of a surgical incision.  The reason the risks are so much greater with this type of procedure is because the patient is typically under general anesthesia during the biopsy and is sometimes required to stay overnight in the hospital to recover.  And, of course, there is risk of medical malpractice associated with any type of surgical procedure, no matter how small.

The core needle biopsy involves insertion of a hollow core needle through the skin and into the breast tissue to collect a sample.  The core test is usually done as an out-patient procedure, and typically only requires the use of local anesthesia.
Another important fact to note is that only a small percentage of women who undergo breast biopsies are actually suffering from cancer.  This means that the core needle biopsy will help reduce the number of woman who are not suffering from cancer, but are still placed at risk of a surgical procedure, thereby reducing the chance of surgical malpractice on countless patients.

Of course, each situation is different, and all options should be carefully researched and considered on a case by case basis.  It’s always best to discuss with a doctor to determine which method would be best.  However, hopefully this new option will encourage women to be advocates for their own health and help reduce the risk they face in the process.

For some people, this message comes too late.  Anyone who has been harmed during a surgical breast biopsy should contact a medical attorney immediately to find out if there is a legitimate case of medical malpractice.


Lawsuit Filed in Cardiac Arrest Misdiagnosis

December 26, 2009

The family of an Ohio woman whose cardiac arrest went undiagnosed has filed a wrongful death lawsuit on her behalf.  Failure to diagnose cardiac arrest is almost always deadly, and this is no exception.

The family alleges that when 62 year old Eva Walker was brought to the hospital by ambulance with symptoms of cardiac arrest, she was instead misdiagnosed with headaches and shortness of breath and sent home.

Walker died the same day from her condition.

Cardiac arrest causes the heart to stop pumping and the blood pressure to subsequently drop drastically.  It must be treated, and promptly, otherwise the patient will die.  In fact, according to Resuscitation Council UK, the chances of survival for a person suffering cardiac arrest decrease by an incredible 10% each minute it goes undiagnosed.

Do you know someone who died from failure to diagnose cardiac arrest?  You may have the right to receive compensation for your loss, and even more importantly, get justice for the victim.  Contact a medical attorney experienced in failure to diagnose cases who can assess your situation and help you determine if you have a case.


Woman Sues Hospital for Amputating Legs

December 24, 2009

A young Pennsylvania woman is suing Uniontown Hospital for medical malpractice claiming that doctors overlooked an acute medical condition due to her intoxication.  As a result, the 20 year old underwent partial amputation of both of her legs.

According to the medical lawsuit, Shanna Hiles had consumed a large amount of alcohol while celebrating her birthday and subsequently lost consciousness.  She remained unconscious, seated on the floor with her legs tucked under her for over 12 hours before she was discovered by a relative the following day.

As a result of the position she had been in, she was experiencing tremendous pain in her legs, and was taken to the hospital.  It is there that Hiles’ medical attorney claims that doctors were negligent in failing to promptly and accurately diagnose the condition she was suffering from, known as acute compartment syndrome.  The condition is reversible with timely surgical intervention.

Hiles was not treated promptly, however, and was instead left unattended for nearly six hours because she was intoxicated.  She was finally air lifted to another hospital where it was necessary that both legs be partially amputated.

Hiles medical lawyer claims that his client would never have had to undergo such drastic surgery had she been properly monitored and treated.  She is seeking an undisclosed amount in damages.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.