There might be good reasons to consider changes in how malpractice suits are handled. But the idea that tort reform would significantly slow, or even alter, the trajectory of U.S. health care spending is not among them.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office recently estimated that tort reform could save $41 billion over the next decade, a figure now being touted by proponents.

To most of us, $41 billion is a lot of money. In the world of health care, it’s a tiny drop in a very large ocean. Between now and 2019, annual health care spending will increase by $2 trillion. Not to $2 trillion. It will grow by $2 trillion, from $2.5 trillion to about $4.5 trillion.

The projected savings from capping malpractice awards works out to a 2 percent reduction in what we otherwise would spend.

A Measly 2 percent!

Read the whole article/editorial here…  http://www.sacbee.com/846/story/2542910.html

At the time of the incident, Mrs. Carlin was already in the hospital where she was receiving ongoing “conservative medical management” for what doctors had diagnosed as an obstructed bowel.  Her gastroenterologist had determined that her condition was improving, and decided to keep her on the course of treatment she was on.

That all changed, however, when her gastroenterologist left town for a few days and she was seen by Dr. Zahid Chohan, a surgeon, who immediately scheduled Carlin for surgery the following day during which he removed more than twelve inches of her intestine.

Over the next several months Carlin was forced to undergo additional surgeries and was treated for multiple infections and complications caused by the original procedure.  Her medical attorney stated that Carlin spent a total of 88 days in the hospital, and must take medication daily to combat the pain she experiences.  She also has difficulty controlling her bowels and is terribly scarred.

The medical malpractice trial lasted three weeks before the jury found in favor of the plaintiff and her husband, awarding them $2.2 million and $200,000, respectively.

Patricia Quirk was diagnosed with stage three endometrial cancer in 2003 and immediately began radiation treatment at an Illinois medical center.  She received eleven treatments that were futile, during which she was severely over-radiated.  The overdose of radiation caused her bowel to become perforated, which cased the sepsis that ultimately led to her death.

According to the Quirk family’s medical attorney, the victim was supposed to receive 180 centigrays of radiation, but instead received an alarming 270 centigrays.  The wrongful death lawsuit claims that doctors failed to properly monitor and supervise the amount of radiation being administered and therefore did not catch the overdose.

Radiation treatments in normal doses take a tremendous toll on the body.  Side effects like anemia, bleeding, infections, tissue irritation and hair loss are commonly seen in this type of cancer treatment.  The idea of Ms. Quirk receiving 50% more than necessary is almost inconceivable.  Unfortunately, it did happen, and her family is now left to deal with her premature death.

The Quirk family agreed to a settlement of $7.5 million for their loss, and the case did not have to go to court.  If you have been a victim of radiation overdose, or lost a loved one as a result of this type of egregious medical error, you too may be entitled to compensation.  Contact a medical lawyer right away.

The lawsuit was filed earlier this month by Veronica Sasenbury, who says that when she went in for surgery to treat her hyperparathyroidism, doctors allowed a hot object to press against her back causing her to suffer serious burns.  She was only 12 years old at the time.

Sasenbury says that doctors were negligent in failing to properly monitor her surgery preparation.  Her suit also states that one of the doctors at the hospital where the incident occurred did not properly supervise his assistants with regard to the proper placement of surgical devices.

As a result of the medical error, Sasenbury has had to endure multiple additional surgeries, is permanently disfigured and has suffered costly medical expenses, pain and suffering.

Every surgical procedure comes with a risk.  Some errors are completely unavoidable and not every mistake constitutes surgical malpractice.  There are some, however, that medical attorneys see more frequently than others, such as:

• Surgery on wrong organ, wrong site surgery or wrong side surgery
• Incorrect incision
• Use of unsanitary surgical utensils
• Puncture or perforation of an organ
• Delayed surgery
• Prolonged surgery

There are plenty of other scenarios in which a doctor or medical staff’s negligence contributes to the injury of a patient and causes surgical malpractice, but the best way to know for sure if you have been a victim is to sit down with a medical lawyer who has experience in dealing with surgical malpractice lawsuits.  He or she can evaluate your claim and help you determine what the next step should be.

Perhaps even more alarming is the fact that the initial injury may not be what caused her death.  According to the baby’s father, his daughter lay for two days and doctors never even dressed the gaping wound on her arm.

The hospital is all but denying the allegations, stating simply that, “the baby’s arm got hurt but it was not serious”.  They went on to say that “things like this do happen”.

Given the level of shock and anger over the child’s senseless death, the hospital is now being investigated by authorities and a promise has been made that the appropriate action will be taken against those who are found guilty.

It’s certainly no surprise that cases of medical malpractice occur all over the globe.  In fact, its cases like this that serve as reminders of how much more dangerous medical care can be in other countries.  But although the standard of care is typically higher in the US than in other nations, medical errors still occur.  If you have been a victim, contact a medical attorney right away to discuss your rights.

It’s important to keep in mind that an independent medical examiner’s main objective is to assist the defense in disproving your claim or minimizing the extent of your injuries.  Given this fact, you should be prepared ahead of time and know what to expect before your appointment so that you don’t do anything that might hurt your case.

Here are a few suggestions:

Be concise when answering questions. When asked about your pain or symptoms, state them clearly and concisely.  Rambling on may result in your saying the wrong thing by mistake, or mentioning something that may hurt your case in the long run.  Keep it to the point and you will be fine.

Be polite and cooperative. There is no need to be hostile with the independent medical examiner, even though you know he is technically not on your side.  Be as pleasant as you can and do as he or she asks.  For example, if the doctor requests that you bend or twist, do so to the best of your ability, but don’t make a production of it.

Know your condition and don’t minimize it. Although it’s good to be concise in your answers, you should also be sure not to leave out anything important when it involves your pain and symptoms.  Be specific in your list of limitations and complaints so that everything important is properly documented.

Avoid exaggeration. It may be tempting to get carried away when describing the real pain you’re experiencing, but try to keep it realistic.  Going overboard may make you appear to be dishonest which can only hurt your case.

Understand the details of your claim. The medical examiner may ask you specific questions about your case, like the date of the incident, the details of what happened, or the names of doctors you have consulted with.  Know this stuff ahead of time so that you’re prepared and confident.

Try not to be emotional. Certainly the experience of being a medical malpractice victim can be an emotional one, and dealing with the pain and suffering is upsetting.  But try to stay as focused as possible when meeting with the medical examiner.  Leaving the emotion out of it can make the visit go much more quickly and smoothly.

Be honest. Medical malpractice is a very real problem in this country, and only those cases that are legitimate should be pursued.  If a medical attorney has agreed that you are, in fact, a victim, there should be no reason to lie or stretch the truth when visiting with an independent medical examiner.  Doing so will only serve to hurt your case so remember to keep it honest.

These are just a few suggestions to help prepare you for this part of your case.  Your medical attorney will sit down with you to discuss your concerns and answer any questions you may have before you go to the appointment.  Being prepared and knowing what to expect can make a difference between a winning case or a loss.

Cardiac catheterization with the use of coronary stents is commonly done in an attempt to open up clogged arteries.  According to reports, the patients affected had only minor blockages in their arteries that did not warrant the use of coronary stents.  As a result these patients were exposed to unnecessary risk.

Coronary stents are typically implanted via the bloodstream and through the leg.  The risks associated with cardiac catheterization include:

• Bleeding
• Infection
• Allergic reaction
• Damage to blood vessels
• Blood clots
• Low blood pressure
• Kidney damage
• Arrhythmias
• Heart Attack
• Stroke

It is believed that a possible underlying reason for the unnecessary procedures is health care fraud, for which the hospital is currently under investigation.  These procedures are quite costly and most insurance providers, including Medicare, require that a patient’s artery be at least 70% blocked before they will approve the use of a stent.  It is reported that the hospital told the affected patients that they had frighteningly large blockages, some up to 95%, when in reality most of the blockages were less than 10%.

Being forced to undergo any unnecessary procedure can be physically and emotionally taxing on anyone.  The fact that the patients involved in this case underwent such a dangerous one only makes the situation that much more upsetting.  We will most likely see an influx of medical malpractice lawsuits as a result.

Arnold Pier, director of a small private hospital in Wegberg, is being charged with causing bodily harm resulting in death for using lemon juice instead of sterile solutions to clean and disinfect his patients’ surgical wounds.  There are 64 counts against him involving 18 patients.

On Friday Pier was found guilty on one of those counts and sentenced to 15 months for the death of an unnamed woman who died as a result of a severe infection from the use of lemon juice in her wound.  The court found that the woman was not given informed consent about the unconventional treatment and therefore did not know the risks involved.

Court documents revealed that Pier regularly instructed hospital staff to use lemon juice, which was not properly sterilized, in the treatment of wounds as a way to cut costs for the struggling medical facility.  Prosecutors also allege that Pier conducted several unnecessary surgeries including kidney and gall bladder removals, as a way to make more money.

The judge presiding over the case called the acts committed a clear case of medical malpractice.  There are several additional cases pending against Pier regarding other patients who lost their lives due to his negligence.