The Importance of Understanding Statutes of Limitations

July 10, 2009

A recent situation that arose in Wisconsin serves as a reminder of the importance of understanding what the medical malpractice statute of limitations is in your state, and how it works.

Kathy Genrich, whose husband died on August 11, 2003 from an infection after doctors left a surgical sponge inside his body during ulcer surgery, waited until August 9, 2006 to file her wrongful death lawsuit.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed her claim because the statute of limitations in that state says that the suit must be filed within 3 years from the incident.  Although it appeared that there were still a few days to spare within the three year mark, Genrich’s case didn’t stand because the law says that the statute begins at the time of the injury, not the time of the death.

Robert Genrich’s surgery took place in July 2003, which is when the sponge was left behind and the subsequent clock started ticking.  His wife was merely days too late.

Each state has their own laws and medical malpractice statutes of limitations may range anywhere from two to seven years.  If you have been a victim of a doctor’s negligence, time is of the essence so speak to a medical attorney right away, before it’s too late for you too.


What is Your Medical Malpractice Claim Worth?

July 8, 2009

All victims of medical malpractice feel that they are entitled to compensation for the damages they’ve suffered, but just how much is a claim worth?  Each situation is different, so the outcomes will likely be just as unique; however there are certain things that most successful malpractice claims will net for the victim.

Injuries suffered.  At the core of most medical malpractice lawsuits are the injuries that the victim has suffered as a result of a doctor’s negligence.  In cases that are settled or won in court, the patient is usually compensated based on the severity of the injury or damages.  If the injuries are minor or temporary, the award will likely be smaller, just enough to cover medical expenses and possibly some pain and suffering.  Permanent injuries will obviously net a larger result because the award is typically meant to cover past as well as future medical expenses and a greater amount of pain and suffering to the victim.

Lost wages. If it can be adequately proven in court that the injuries suffered by the patient caused them to miss work, the monetary award may include compensation for those lost wages.  It might also include an estimate of future lost wages if it is clear that the injury will continue to hinder the patient from working in the future.

Medical bills.  Some injuries require further treatments to heal or be corrected, such as additional surgeries or physical therapy.  These procedures can be costly and, if the injury occurred through a doctor’s negligence, the patient should not be held responsible for paying.  For this reason, past, present and future (estimated) medical expenses will probably be figured into the total amount of the award.

Out of pocket expenses. In addition to medical bills, victims of malpractice are often faced with having to make adjustments to their everyday life to adapt to their injuries.  Expenses such as purchasing medical equipment, hiring in-home healthcare assistance, and making changes to the home necessary to accommodate the victim’s impairments are all considered out of pocket expenses and are often included in when calculating how much compensation the victim will receive.

Pain and suffering. This is probably the most difficult part of an injury to prove because it’s something that one cannot place a specific price tag on.  The severity and nature of the injury is usually the deciding factor as to whether or not a medical malpractice settlement will include monies for pain and suffering.  Obviously, someone who now suffers from a permanent disfigurement or paralysis will likely receive more toward their pain and suffering than someone who suffered only minor and temporary damages.

While it’s impossible to truly estimate how much your individual medical malpractice claim is worth, or even if it will be successful, discussing your situation with an experienced medical attorney can help give you a better idea of what to expect and guide you in the right direction toward the next step in the process.


The Trouble with Plastic Surgery Malpractice

July 6, 2009

As with any type of surgery, those that are cosmetic in nature come with health risks and possible danger to the patient.  Plastic surgeons are also just as capable of committing malpractice as any other type of surgeon.  The trouble with plastic surgery malpractice is the ability to prove negligence.

Many people who chose to undergo a cosmetic procedure do so at their own discretion.  Surgeries such as rhinoplasty, breast augmentation and tummy tucks are becoming more and more popular in today’s society.  The problem arises when a patient recovers from the procedure only to find that they are not happy with the results.  Many of these patients feel angry and embarrassed, and one of their first calls is to a medical attorney.

Unfortunately, for many people that is often as far as they will be able to get in their quest for justice.

The truth is elective surgery is just that – elective.  The patient does not need the surgery to save his or her life.  It is done for no other reason than to beautify the patient or to correct a perceived imperfection on the body.  For many people who seek this type of medical intervention, there are underlying emotional and psychological issues that cause their unhappiness with their appearance.  For that reason, the results of the surgery, no matter how perfect they may appear to the outside world, will never heal the inner emotions of the patient.  They will still feel the same unhappiness with their appearance, and will often feel angry at having spent a significant amount of money in the process.

The bottom line is, you can’t sue a doctor just because you are unhappy with the results of your plastic surgery.  It’s just that simple.  This is why patients should always explore the true reasons behind why they desire to have elective surgery prior to making such a significant, and often permanent, decision.

Of course, if a doctor has made an error and left you scarred or permanently injured, you certainly have the right to seek compensation.  The best way to determine whether or not you are truly a victim of plastic surgery malpractice is to speak with an experienced medical attorney.


The Difference between Medical Malpractice and Board Action

July 4, 2009

Perhaps you’ve read news articles about doctors receiving disciplinary actions by the medical board in the state in which they practice medicine and have thought the physician must also be guilty of medical malpractice.  There is a significant difference between these two types of actions, however, and you should be familiar with how they compare, particularly if you are looking into a doctor’s background before deciding to seek his or her treatment.

Board actions are taken against physicians in an attempt to protect the public.  They typically follow a formal complaint made by a patient, a subsequent investigation into the incident, and a hearing.  The main purpose of these types of actions are not to punish the physician in question, although part of the action may include suspension or revocation of the doctor’s license, but are instead meant to protect the public from further errors on the part of a doctor who may need additional training.

Medical malpractice, on the other hand, is a much less exact science in that it does not follow such stringent guidelines as board actions, and is typically meant to punish the offending doctor.  Although malpractice laws are complex and not every medical error is actionable, anyone has the right to file a medical malpractice regardless of evidence (although cases with no evidentiary foundation will not make it very far).  Conversely, board actions only occur after a thorough investigation produces evidence of wrongdoing.

Additionally, medical malpractice settlements are often offered to avoid a court trial.  This doesn’t necessarily involve the admission of guilt, whereas a board action against a physician indicates that the medical board has, indeed, proven that the doctor acted negligently in some fashion.

Another difference between the two is the public record of board actions.  Sanctions imposed by a board are required to be reported to the Federation of State Medical Boards as well as several other medical associations and government agencies and are kept on record.  This information is available to the public, allowing patients to research the background of a potential doctor prior to deciding to seek treatment with them.  Medical malpractice settlements are not necessarily as easy to find, and some settlements include gag orders to keep the victim quiet.

The bottom line is, if you are attempting to avoid becoming a victim of malpractice, you may not be able to do so solely by checking to see if there have been any lawsuits against the doctor you are considering.  It may make more sense to check with the medical board in your state to truly know the background of the physician you are about to entrust with your health.


Wisconsin Woman Gets Second Chance in her Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

July 2, 2009

65 year old Marlene Petzel showed her physician that she wouldn’t stop fighting for justice after her original medical malpractice claim was dismissed and she appealed the decision.

The lawsuit stemmed from a hip replacement surgery performed by Dr. Mark Wikenheiser in 2003, during which Petzel claims a nerve in her knee was damaged causing partial paralysis in her foot.  During the original trial, medical experts for both the plaintiff and the defendants disagreed as to how the injury occurred and whether it was directly related to the surgery.

A three-judge panel heard Ms. Petzel’s appeal and agreed that a jury should hear the case, review the evidence and decide whether there was, in fact, medical negligence involved.

If you have been a victim of medical malpractice and have sought justice only to have your case dismissed, you may still be able to seek justice, just like Ms. Petzel, and appeal the decision.  An experienced medical attorney can review your case and help you determine whether it’s worth pursuing.

Source:    http://ksax.com


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.