Medical Malpractice Results in Double Homicide

May 14, 2009

The mother of a mentally ill man who killed his grandparents in 2005 has filed a medical malpractice suit against his psychiatrist claiming that the murders stemmed from the doctor’s negligence.

Lisa Lambeth says son Christopher’s conditions, which include bi-polar disorder and schizophrenia, were not being properly monitored and he was not provided appropriate behavioral health services even though they were repeated requested, when he fatally stabbed both of his grandparents on April 10th 2005 while they slept.

Dr. Virgil Hancock had been treating Christopher since 2003.  In late 2004, he met with Lambeth and his mother, who informed him that Christopher was not taking his medication and was exhibiting violent tendencies as a result.  She requested that her son be admitted to a psychiatric hospital, but Hancock refused.

Several weeks later, after Christopher had a violent outburst at his mother’s home, he was finally admitted to Sonora Behavioral Health Hospital where medical notes signed by Dr. Hancock indicate that Lambeth “was unable to control his anger and was homicidal and had a target and a plan”.

Despite this, Lambeth was released to the custody of his aging grandparents.  Lisa Lambeth repeatedly expressed concern for the safety of her parents and requested that her son be provided residential behavioral health services to remove him from her parents’ home.  Her requests fell on deaf ears and just days after her last request Christopher Lambeth stabbed his grandparents to death.

Lambeth plead guilty to the murders, but claimed insanity.  He was sentenced to two concurrent life sentences to be served at the Arizona State Hospital in Phoenix.

The lawsuit claims that the murders may have been prevented if not for the negligence of both Dr. Hancock and his employer, COPE Behavioral Services.  It is scheduled to be heard within the coming weeks.  An update on the outcome will follow as soon as available.


Maine Woman Unsuccessful in Dental Malpractice Claim

May 12, 2009

Last week, jurors found in favor of a Lewiston dental surgeon on charges of dental malpractice in which he was accused of leaving a woman with permanent facial nerve damage and the inability to smile.

Nancy Jacob recently brought the suit against Dr. Jan Kippax after he allegedly botched a biopsy he was performing on her.  She, along with her medical attorney, claimed that during the procedure he damaged several nerves making it impossible for her to smile without substantial pain.

The dentist claimed he did not act negligently, and that the pictures shown during the trial depicting Jacob swollen and bruised were taken right after the procedure and showed the normal results of such a surgery and were likely worsened due to the patient failing to properly ice the area.  The jury agreed and found Dr. Kippax not guilty.

Unfortunately, not every medical malpractice case that goes to court will be successful.  For this reason, it is critical that an experienced medical attorney review the details of each case as well as medical records and other evidence to determine whether the claim is strong enough to stand up in court.

Source:  www.kennebecjournal.mainetoday.com


Nursing Errors – Causes and Consequences

May 9, 2009

Nursing errors are typically not mentioned as much as other types of medical malpractice, however the instances in which they occur are steadily on the rise.  In fact, since 1995 more than 9,500 patients have been injured as a result of errors made by nurses.  1,700 have died.  These numbers are alarming, certainly warranting a closer look at what causes nursing errors and their consequences.

If you look at the job listings in most any area of the country, you are bound to see an abundance of openings for nursing positions.  The truth is there is a severe shortage of qualified nurses across the US.  This inevitably means that those who are employed are taking on a workload that is often much larger than it should be.  Many hospitals require their nurses to work mandatory overtime, adding insult to injury.  The result of this is a nursing staff that is overworked and exhausted.

Additionally, to make up for the shortage, many hospitals hire temps who are under qualified to lessen the load.  This dangerous combination can, and often does result in nursing errors.

As with any other type of medical mistakes, the consequences of nursing errors can range anywhere from simple to life threatening.  A few of the more common types of nursing errors include but are not limited to:

  • Improper medication dosage
  • Medication dispensed to wrong patient
  • Failure to report changes in patient condition to a physician
  • Failure to properly note changes in patient condition on charts
  • Improper use of medical devise
  • Failure to perform vital care in a timely manner
  • Performing tasks that are beyond the scope of their training

Any of these errors can result in injury or even death to the patient.  Victims of nursing errors are encouraged to discuss their situation with a medical lawyer who is experienced in dealing with these types of medical malpractice claims.


Possible Outcomes of your Medical Malpractice Claim

May 7, 2009

If you recently suffered injury at the hands of a negligent physician, you may have already consulted with a medical attorney and begun the process of filing a medical malpractice claim against the offending doctor.  But once the ball gets rolling, what can you expect next?  Will you go to court?  Will your case be decided by a judge or a jury?

There are generally three possible outcomes of medical malpractice cases.

Settling out of court. Contrary to popular belief, not every medical malpractice case ends up in court.  Many times the guilty party will admit fault and agree to settle to avoid further litigation.  This often happens when the doctor being accused and his attorneys feel that they don’t have a strong enough case to win in court.  When cases are settled out of court, they are typically concluded quickly (within a few months) which can be beneficial to the victim, especially when they are in need of settlement funds to pay medical bills and other expenses.

Mediation/arbitration. Often times both parties in a lawsuit cannot agree on a settlement amount and are forced to take the case to the next level.  This doesn’t necessarily mean court is in your future.  If you are unhappy with the settlement amount offered but would like to avoid a lengthy court battle, you have the option of using mediation or arbitration first to try and reach an agreed upon outcome.  All the parties involved, along with their legal representation, will meet with an unbiased third party affiliated with the court to try and reach an agreement that everyone is happy with and avoid going to court.  This can also mean a faster outcome than an actual courtroom case.

Going to court.  Sometimes an agreed upon settlement cannot be reached and the case must be presented to a judge or jury for a final decision.  Expert witnesses are usually called by both sides and testimony is heard as well as evidence presented for review.  It’s important to know that medical malpractice cases that end up in court can take a long time to resolve so you should be prepared to be in it for the long haul should your case end up in litigation.

Of course, every case is different and it can never be predicted exactly how yours will go, however your medical attorney should be able to give you a better idea of which option might be best for your individual situation, and also be able to estimate the possible amount of time you can expect your particular case to last.


Medical Malpractice Case Results in $12 Million Verdict

May 5, 2009

A Tennessee jury has returned a judgment in favor of 33 year old Kristen Freeman, whose case of medical malpractice has left her permanently brain damaged after a botched medical procedure.
Dr. Michael Goodman was negligent in performing the routine gastroenterology procedure, used to diagnose bowel problems.  His medical errors left Freeman so brain damaged that she can no longer care for herself.
The judgment totaled $12 million, however the jury found Dr. Goodman only 51% at fault, therefore the amount Freeman can collect is only $6.12 million.  It is still considered one of the largest settlements with regard to medical errors in Hamilton County, according to Freeman’s medical attorney.

Source: www.knoxnews.com


Elements of EMT/Paramedic Malpractice

May 2, 2009

We all rely on EMT’s and paramedics to be there for us should emergency medical treatment be necessary.  These first responders must be highly trained and skilled in any number of medical intervention methods in order to properly perform their duties.  Sometimes, however, an EMT or paramedic fails to live up to these expectations and their negligence can result in malpractice.  But what are the elements of EMT/Paramedic malpractice?

To understand this you must first recognize what is expected of these medical professionals.  Along with their extensive medical training, EMT’s are also expected to:

  • Recognize a medical emergency
  • Quickly assess the situation, including existing/pre-existing conditions if necessary
  • Manage the emergency care of the patient
  • Assign priorities of treatment
  • Initiate/continue emergency medical care
  • Assess and initiate proper invasive and noninvasive treatments
  • Monitor the response of the patient
  • Coordinate their efforts with those of other agencies
  • Record and communicate data to the designated medical authority
  • Establish a rapport with the patient
  • Manage/decrease the state of a crisis

As you can clearly see, the role of a paramedic is far from easy.  Not only must they respond quickly to any given medical emergency situation, but they must also be able to take control of the situation and swiftly assess and administer treatment.  Failure to do so, or do so in a timely manner, can have life-altering results.

When any of these steps are missed or not performed to the highest of standards, errors can and do occur.  Delay in treatment, incorrect treatment or failure to treat altogether often result in EMT/paramedic malpractice.  If you received substandard care from an emergency medical technician who did not meet the above requirements in treating you and as a result you suffered injury, or your existing illness or injury was made worse, you have legal rights.  Discuss your situation with a medical lawyer today to learn more.


Nevada May Lift Medical Malpractice Cap in Cases of Gross Negligence

May 1, 2009

The Nevada State Assembly has passed preliminary legislation that would lift the present $350,000 medical malpractice damages cap in cases where a jury finds a doctor or medical facility guilty of gross negligence.  The bill is now awaiting Senate approval.
The current cap, enacted in 2001, limits the amount of non-economic damages a medical malpractice victim can collect with regards to pain & suffering and other punitive losses.
The pending changes were initiated after the recent highly publicized case in which two Nevada health clinics used contaminated medical equipment, exposing thousands of patients who received colonoscopies to possible disease.  As a result of this gross negligence, more than a hundred patients have tested positive for Hepatitis C.
The new legislation specifies that the cap will be lifted only in cases in which a jury finds “a conscious indifference to the consequence of the actions or an indifference to the safety and welfare of a patient”.  In other words, only in cases of gross negligence, not simply medical error.  The cap will remain in place for situations of medical malpractice that do not necessarily reach a level of gross negligence.
Still, if passed, the new bill would be a huge victory for future victims and help to ensure that doctors continue to maintain a high standard of care when dealing with patients.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.