What is Your Medical Malpractice Claim Worth?

July 8, 2009

All victims of medical malpractice feel that they are entitled to compensation for the damages they’ve suffered, but just how much is a claim worth?  Each situation is different, so the outcomes will likely be just as unique; however there are certain things that most successful malpractice claims will net for the victim.

Injuries suffered.  At the core of most medical malpractice lawsuits are the injuries that the victim has suffered as a result of a doctor’s negligence.  In cases that are settled or won in court, the patient is usually compensated based on the severity of the injury or damages.  If the injuries are minor or temporary, the award will likely be smaller, just enough to cover medical expenses and possibly some pain and suffering.  Permanent injuries will obviously net a larger result because the award is typically meant to cover past as well as future medical expenses and a greater amount of pain and suffering to the victim.

Lost wages. If it can be adequately proven in court that the injuries suffered by the patient caused them to miss work, the monetary award may include compensation for those lost wages.  It might also include an estimate of future lost wages if it is clear that the injury will continue to hinder the patient from working in the future.

Medical bills.  Some injuries require further treatments to heal or be corrected, such as additional surgeries or physical therapy.  These procedures can be costly and, if the injury occurred through a doctor’s negligence, the patient should not be held responsible for paying.  For this reason, past, present and future (estimated) medical expenses will probably be figured into the total amount of the award.

Out of pocket expenses. In addition to medical bills, victims of malpractice are often faced with having to make adjustments to their everyday life to adapt to their injuries.  Expenses such as purchasing medical equipment, hiring in-home healthcare assistance, and making changes to the home necessary to accommodate the victim’s impairments are all considered out of pocket expenses and are often included in when calculating how much compensation the victim will receive.

Pain and suffering. This is probably the most difficult part of an injury to prove because it’s something that one cannot place a specific price tag on.  The severity and nature of the injury is usually the deciding factor as to whether or not a medical malpractice settlement will include monies for pain and suffering.  Obviously, someone who now suffers from a permanent disfigurement or paralysis will likely receive more toward their pain and suffering than someone who suffered only minor and temporary damages.

While it’s impossible to truly estimate how much your individual medical malpractice claim is worth, or even if it will be successful, discussing your situation with an experienced medical attorney can help give you a better idea of what to expect and guide you in the right direction toward the next step in the process.


The Trouble with Plastic Surgery Malpractice

July 6, 2009

As with any type of surgery, those that are cosmetic in nature come with health risks and possible danger to the patient.  Plastic surgeons are also just as capable of committing malpractice as any other type of surgeon.  The trouble with plastic surgery malpractice is the ability to prove negligence.

Many people who chose to undergo a cosmetic procedure do so at their own discretion.  Surgeries such as rhinoplasty, breast augmentation and tummy tucks are becoming more and more popular in today’s society.  The problem arises when a patient recovers from the procedure only to find that they are not happy with the results.  Many of these patients feel angry and embarrassed, and one of their first calls is to a medical attorney.

Unfortunately, for many people that is often as far as they will be able to get in their quest for justice.

The truth is elective surgery is just that – elective.  The patient does not need the surgery to save his or her life.  It is done for no other reason than to beautify the patient or to correct a perceived imperfection on the body.  For many people who seek this type of medical intervention, there are underlying emotional and psychological issues that cause their unhappiness with their appearance.  For that reason, the results of the surgery, no matter how perfect they may appear to the outside world, will never heal the inner emotions of the patient.  They will still feel the same unhappiness with their appearance, and will often feel angry at having spent a significant amount of money in the process.

The bottom line is, you can’t sue a doctor just because you are unhappy with the results of your plastic surgery.  It’s just that simple.  This is why patients should always explore the true reasons behind why they desire to have elective surgery prior to making such a significant, and often permanent, decision.

Of course, if a doctor has made an error and left you scarred or permanently injured, you certainly have the right to seek compensation.  The best way to determine whether or not you are truly a victim of plastic surgery malpractice is to speak with an experienced medical attorney.


The Difference between Medical Malpractice and Board Action

July 4, 2009

Perhaps you’ve read news articles about doctors receiving disciplinary actions by the medical board in the state in which they practice medicine and have thought the physician must also be guilty of medical malpractice.  There is a significant difference between these two types of actions, however, and you should be familiar with how they compare, particularly if you are looking into a doctor’s background before deciding to seek his or her treatment.

Board actions are taken against physicians in an attempt to protect the public.  They typically follow a formal complaint made by a patient, a subsequent investigation into the incident, and a hearing.  The main purpose of these types of actions are not to punish the physician in question, although part of the action may include suspension or revocation of the doctor’s license, but are instead meant to protect the public from further errors on the part of a doctor who may need additional training.

Medical malpractice, on the other hand, is a much less exact science in that it does not follow such stringent guidelines as board actions, and is typically meant to punish the offending doctor.  Although malpractice laws are complex and not every medical error is actionable, anyone has the right to file a medical malpractice regardless of evidence (although cases with no evidentiary foundation will not make it very far).  Conversely, board actions only occur after a thorough investigation produces evidence of wrongdoing.

Additionally, medical malpractice settlements are often offered to avoid a court trial.  This doesn’t necessarily involve the admission of guilt, whereas a board action against a physician indicates that the medical board has, indeed, proven that the doctor acted negligently in some fashion.

Another difference between the two is the public record of board actions.  Sanctions imposed by a board are required to be reported to the Federation of State Medical Boards as well as several other medical associations and government agencies and are kept on record.  This information is available to the public, allowing patients to research the background of a potential doctor prior to deciding to seek treatment with them.  Medical malpractice settlements are not necessarily as easy to find, and some settlements include gag orders to keep the victim quiet.

The bottom line is, if you are attempting to avoid becoming a victim of malpractice, you may not be able to do so solely by checking to see if there have been any lawsuits against the doctor you are considering.  It may make more sense to check with the medical board in your state to truly know the background of the physician you are about to entrust with your health.


Wisconsin Woman Gets Second Chance in her Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

July 2, 2009

65 year old Marlene Petzel showed her physician that she wouldn’t stop fighting for justice after her original medical malpractice claim was dismissed and she appealed the decision.

The lawsuit stemmed from a hip replacement surgery performed by Dr. Mark Wikenheiser in 2003, during which Petzel claims a nerve in her knee was damaged causing partial paralysis in her foot.  During the original trial, medical experts for both the plaintiff and the defendants disagreed as to how the injury occurred and whether it was directly related to the surgery.

A three-judge panel heard Ms. Petzel’s appeal and agreed that a jury should hear the case, review the evidence and decide whether there was, in fact, medical negligence involved.

If you have been a victim of medical malpractice and have sought justice only to have your case dismissed, you may still be able to seek justice, just like Ms. Petzel, and appeal the decision.  An experienced medical attorney can review your case and help you determine whether it’s worth pursuing.

Source:    http://ksax.com


PSA – Beware of Medical Attorneys that Promise Miracles

June 30, 2009

Of course everyone who contacts a medical attorney hopes to win.  Even more than that, most clients want to win as much as possible.  It’s not necessarily greed that drives this.  In most cases, victims of medical malpractice are left to suffer a lifetime of medical bills, lost wages and future treatments, on top of their pain and suffering.  They feel that someone should have to pay for these expenses, and they are right.  But not every lawsuit ends in a windfall, and people should beware of any attorney who promises them a jackpot right off the bat.

Medical malpractice cases are usually the result of a doctor’s error.  But not every mistake constitutes negligence.  Some cases might not even be worth pursuing because the evidence is just not strong enough to prove.  And those that are deemed actionable don’t always end the way the plaintiff hopes.

The truth is there is absolutely no way that an experienced medical attorney could possibly know exactly how your case will turn out.  And they certainly do not know how much, if anything, you will receive as a monetary compensation.  This is all determined when and if your case is settled or goes to trial.

There are plenty of sharks out there that promise their clients the world before they even know the details of the case.  Chances are, these lawyers aren’t worth hiring and you should be wary of them.

Of course, for every bad seed in the legal world, there are qualified, experienced and honest medical attorneys who will only take on cases that they truly believe have a chance of being successful.  And those worth their salt would never blindly promise a client anything.  A good lawyer will take the time to discuss your case in detail, review all of your evidence and medical records and give you an honest, no frills opinion.

If you are a victim of medical malpractice, be sure to do your own due diligence when selecting someone to represent you and be aware that empty promises are often just that, empty.


Court of Appeals Revives Birth Injury Case

June 29, 2009

The medical malpractice lawsuit filed by James and Lynette Ashburn whose daughter suffers seizures due to a birth injury is being sent to trial by the Indiana Court of Appeals.  The decision was based on the fact that key expert testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs was originally stricken from trial which may have unfairly influenced the court’s ruling to dismiss the case.

The lawsuit stems from the birth of the Ashburn’s daughter, Chloe, who was delivered in 2002 via the use of a suction device.  Although Lynette Ashburn agreed to the use of the device, she alleges that she and her husband were never told of the possible risks involved.

Two days after Chloe was born, she suffered a subdural hematoma which required surgery.  She now suffers from a permanent seizure disorder as a result.  According to the expert medical witness for the Ashburns, a neonatologist who examined and treated the child, the hematoma was caused by the use of the vacuum.  The Court of Appeals felt that this testimony, which was originally stricken from the record, was valid and reversed the decision allowing the case to move forward.

There is one stipulation to the reversal, however.  The appeals court is only allowing the Ashburns to sue the Houser-Norborg-MacGregor Medical Corporation, who manufactures the vacuum device, but not the medical facility where the birth injury occurred.

Birth injuries occur during what is supposed to be one of the happiest moments in life, and can have devastating results.  Anyone whose child has suffered harm before or during delivery has the right to seek compensation and should discuss their situation with a medical attorney who is experienced in birth injury cases.


Another Disturbing Medical Malpractice Statistic

June 28, 2009

It’s a fact that a good majority of medical malpractice claims are the result of missed diagnoses in patients, but some recent statistics may prove why.

Cornell Medical College in New York found in a recent study that doctors fail to notify their patients about positive or abnormal test results seven percent of the time.

That might not seem like a lot, but if you break it down a different way, and realize that that equates to one out of every fourteen tests, it becomes much clearer.

The real issue behind these statistics is the fact that there are good number of patients who are left in the dark about potentially dangerous medical conditions.  This, in turn, prevents adequate and timely treatment, the absence of which can lead to furthering of a disease, complications or even death, thus leading to medical malpractice and wrongful death lawsuits.

This should be taken as yet another reminder of the importance of being an advocate for your own health.  Any patient who undergoes a medical test should follow up afterwards for the results.  Don’t be shy or embarrassed.  If you don’t take matters into your own hands, you too could end up part of this statistic and find yourself filing your own medical malpractice claim.


$1.88 Million Awarded in Cancer Misdiagnosis Case

June 26, 2009

The widow of a Pennsylvania man who died after his bladder cancer was misdiagnosed was awarded just under $2 million in her wrongful death case.  The crux of her lawsuit was the claim that had the cancer been diagnosed in time, it could have been treated sooner and his life potentially spared.

According to court documents, Terrence Golden sought treatment from urologist Mila Smolko for urinary problems several times between September 2002 and January 2004, during which time he was diagnosed with an enlarged and inflamed prostate.  A biopsy of Golden’s bladder was sent to a pathologist, but the cancer was missed again.

In June 2004 Golden went to a different doctor for a second opinion and it was then that his bladder cancer was discovered.

The problem with these late diagnoses lies in the amount of time that the cancer has been left to grow and spread in the meantime.  In bladder cancer, according to the National Cancer Institute, the prognosis depends on how early it is caught and how quickly treatments begin.  If left untreated for a length of time, it can spread to other organs and make treatment less effective.

In Golden’s case, by the time it was finally caught, his bladder cancer spread to his prostate and sections of his urethra.  He underwent surgery to have the affected areas removed but by then it was too late.  The disease had progressed to the point that doctors were no longer able to control and treat it.  Golden died in January of this year.

Misdiagnosing and failing to diagnose cancer can have life threatening consequences, and the doctors who are responsible must be held accountable for their negligence.  Contact a medical attorney for more information about getting justice if you or your loved one is suffering after a cancer misdiagnosis.


Family of Wrongful Death Victim Recognized

June 21, 2009

The widower and daughter of a West Virginia woman who died as a result of medical malpractice have been recognized by the West Virginia Association for Justice for their “bravery and commitment to accountability” in pursuing justice for the victim, Genevieve Haught.

Haught underwent surgery in 2005 to have spots removed from her kidney.  During the procedure, the surgeon perforated Haught’s stomach.  The surgical error caused Ms. Haught to suffer from a subsequent infection, from which she died several months later.

The West Virginia Association for Justice is a group of local attorneys who advocate for the civil justice system.  They chose David Haught and Crystal Rogerson for the honor because they bravely rejected the hospital’s original offer to settle because it had strings attached.  One of stipulations in the original offer was that the family would essentially be under a gag order regarding the settlement.

Haught and Rogerson held firm until they were pleased with the $2 million settlement was offered, with no strings attached, which they accepted.  It was because of their refusal to let the hospital get away without being called out on what happened that they were recognized by the advocacy group.

The president of the Association for Justice, Allan Karlin, said in a news release, “David Haught and Crystal Rogerson exemplify the West Virginians we sought to recognize when we created this award. From the beginning, their greater concern was informing the public about what happened at the facility to ensure it would never happen again. Their courage will undoubtedly save lives.”


Expert Witnesses Help Win LASIK Malpractice Case

June 19, 2009

If ever there was an example of how important it is to have credible expert witnesses in a medical malpractice trial, the case of Devades v. Niksarli, which concluded last week in favor of the plaintiff, is it.  The witnesses produced during the LASIK surgery malpractice trial helped win a $5.6 million verdict for the victim, Johnson Devadas.  It is the second largest verdict ever involving LASIK malpractice.

Devadas sued Dr. Kevin Niksarli after his botched eye surgery left him with a condition called post-LASIK ectasia, which causes a host of vision problems including halos, blurriness, glare, contrast sensitivity and double vision.  Part of the lawsuit involved accusations that Dr. Niksarli acted negligently when he concluded that Devadas was a good candidate for the surgery.

To help prove malpractice, Devadas’ medical attorney called a slew of expert witnesses to testify on behalf of his client.  Dr. Paul Donzis, an ophthalmologist and cornea specialist, testified that the patient was not, in fact, a suitable candidate for LASIK surgery based on past medical records.

Additionally, in an interesting and somewhat disturbing twist, the plaintiff’s called former federal agent Albert Lyter, Ph.D., to the stand.  Lyter is trained in ink dating analysis and revealed on the stand that Dr. Niksarli intentionally doctored dates in Devadas’ medical charts to artificially age them in an attempt to make it appear that he had discussed the risks, benefits and alternatives to LASIK surgery with Devadas and his wife prior to performing the elected procedure.

Finally, Anthony Gamboa, Ph.D., an expert in vocational economics, took the stand to testify to the loss of income that Devadas has and will continue to suffer from as a result of the malpractice.  Devadas was a pharmacist in Queens, New York prior to the surgery.  It is unreported whether he has or ever will be able to return to work given the extent of his injuries.

Devadas ended up victorious in his fight for justice, and he owes most of that success to the quality of expert witnesses chosen by his medical lawyer that helped prove his case to the jury.

Expert witnesses are just one reason why it is critical to hire a qualified medical attorney to represent you in your medical malpractice case.  If you have been a victim, you don’t have to face it alone.  Contact a medical lawyer today.

Source:  www.lasiknewswire.com